LSE vs SLI

Intertype conflict and challenges can arise between the LSE (Logical Sensory Extratim - often compared to the ESTJ in MBTI) and SLI (Sensory Logical Intratim - similar to ISTP in MBTI) due to their differing personality traits, values, and ways of perceiving and interacting with the world. At the core of such conflicts is the difference in their cognitive functions. The LSE is characterized by extraverted thinking (Te) and introverted sensing (Si). They are pragmatic, action-oriented, and detail-focused individuals who rely on facts, evidence and logic. They are typically organized, assertive, and can be quite stubborn and resistant to change. Comfortable in positions of authority, they often take up leadership roles and are good at making rational, objective decisions rapidly. On the other hand, the SLI is characterized by introverted thinking (Ti) and extraverted sensing (Se). They are independent, pragmatic, and adaptable individuals who focus more on the present moment and immediate sensory experiences. They can be spontaneous, flexible, and are typically more easygoing than LSEs. They are not as focused on structure and order, and may resist being controlled or directed by others. One of the main challenges between these two types would be communication. LSEs, being extraverted, are typically more direct and assertive in their communication style. They may come across as blunt or even confrontative to the more introverted SLI, who may prefer a more relaxed and indirect communication style. LSEs' need for structure and order can also create tension with the SLI's preference for flexibility and adaptability. The LSE's desire for control and organization may clash with the SLI's resistance to being controlled or directed by others. Additionally, the LSE's reliance on facts, evidence, and logic may be perceived as rigid and inflexible by the SLI, who values immediate sensory experiences and may be more inclined to trust their own instincts. Another potential source of conflict is decision-making. LSEs are known for their ability to make quick, rational, and objective decisions. They are comfortable in leadership roles and often take charge in decision-making processes. On the other hand, SLIs tend to be more independent and prefer to make decisions based on their own internal logic and understanding. This difference in decision-making styles can lead to clashes and disagreements, as the LSE may see the SLI's approach as too subjective